Post by account_disabled on Feb 23, 2024 23:18:26 GMT -6
The Im targeting do they have similar results Does the chart look the same If you were to take a sample of lets say keywords that you cared about and you were to get the average content length of the top results would it resemble that Would it not Does it have a high standard deviation Is there a big delta because some keywords require a lot of content to answer them fully and some keywords require very very small amounts of content and Google has prioritized accordingly Is it wise then to aim for the average when a much larger article would be much more appreciated and be much more likely to succeed or a.
Much shorter one would do far better Why are you aiming for this Georgia WhatsApp Number List average if thats the case . Is correlation the same as causation The answer is hell no. Never has been. Big fat no. Correlation doesnt even necessarily imply causation. youre looking at an average especially on this type of stuff correlation and causation are totally separate. It is not because the number one result is words that it happens to rank number one. Google does not work that way. Never has never will.
INSTEAD of trusting these big unknown keyword set averages you should A. look at your keywords and your search results and whats working versus not in those specific ones. B. Be willing to innovate be willing to say Hey you know what I see this content today the number one number two number three rankings are in these sorts of averages. But I actually think you can answer this with much shorter content and many searchers would appreciate it. I think these folks who are currently ranking are overcontent creating and they dont need to be. C. You should match your goals and your content goals with searcher goals. Thats how you should.
Much shorter one would do far better Why are you aiming for this Georgia WhatsApp Number List average if thats the case . Is correlation the same as causation The answer is hell no. Never has been. Big fat no. Correlation doesnt even necessarily imply causation. youre looking at an average especially on this type of stuff correlation and causation are totally separate. It is not because the number one result is words that it happens to rank number one. Google does not work that way. Never has never will.
INSTEAD of trusting these big unknown keyword set averages you should A. look at your keywords and your search results and whats working versus not in those specific ones. B. Be willing to innovate be willing to say Hey you know what I see this content today the number one number two number three rankings are in these sorts of averages. But I actually think you can answer this with much shorter content and many searchers would appreciate it. I think these folks who are currently ranking are overcontent creating and they dont need to be. C. You should match your goals and your content goals with searcher goals. Thats how you should.